A bunch of
years ago, Terry Zwigoff made a film about obsessive record collectors called Ghost World. It was based on Daniel
Clowes’ graphic novel and it stars a very young Scarlett Johansson and Thora
Birch as two teenage girls who trail around after some loser old man blues-fan vinyl
junkie (Steve Buscemi) because they are enamored of the
past, which they think is more real than the horrid, plastic, present. Enid and
Rebecca hate everyone and everything, and Enid, for one, can only find solace in the sound of the blues.
I thought of
that scene when I first read Walter Benjamin’s “The Work of Art In The Age of Mechanical Reproduction” and I thought of it again this week as I finished Hari
Kudzru’s new book “White Tears.” Ghost
World is a beautiful and tragic chronicle of the alienation and ennui
imposed on suburban kids by the soul grinding samey-ness of, well, the age of mechanical
reproduction. “White Tears” jacks that aspect of record collecting up about a thousand
percent and then multiplies it by its natural, yet oft hidden, corollary, race-driven
exploitation. In short,
the book is about a whole bunch of things that have been on my mind lately.
First and foremost, it is about hipsters and their appropriation of black music and the scarily obsessive and secretly hurtful nature of what is-or-is-not cool. Its protagonists and anti-heroes, Seth and Carter, are not so much record collectors as sound vultures, jonesing on the sonic patina of other eras, and doing it through actual things: not only records, but special headphones, special sound monitors, hardy old equipment…stuff. They fetishize the past. They live in Brooklyn, and Carter, Seth says, “begins to dress like the year was 1849 and he was heading west to pan for gold.” They bill themselves as audio craftsmen, “artisans of analog. We would even offer to record to quarter-inch tape, if that’s what the client wanted.” Because they are record producers and djays, they pursue particularly rare records to cannibalize for other people’s recordings, post-modernly. “The present is dry, but add reverb and you can hear time reverse its flow, slipping on into the past, into echo and disaster … distance can create longing. It can open up the gap into which all must fall,” Seth tells us.
Marx has a
word for this process, and the word is reification. To thingify. Seth and
Carter thingify sounds. That the things themselves rise up against them in
revenge is just one of the ways this book spins the concept of mass consumerism,
so that here, ‘hurtful’ ends up meaning to be literally hurt, to be beaten,
smashed, and otherwise tortured on the rack of (imagined) social justice. It
also may have something to do with history. Because, as Seth concludes, “On
your record deck you played the sound of the middle passage, the blackest
sound. You wanted the suffering you didn’t have, the authority you thought it
would bring. It scared you, but you thought of the swagger it would put in your
walk, the admiring glances of your friends. Then came the terror when real
darkness first seeped through the walls of your bedroom, the walls designed to
keep you safe and dreaming. And finally your rising sense of shame when you
admitted to yourself that you were relieved the walls were there.”
“White Tears”
has much in common with the film “Get Out,” including an ending that is pretty
much a revenge fantasy and is, fair warning, really violent. Beyond that,
though, it is also a book about rich people: rich people, and rich people’s
kids, and the people around rich people and their kids, and how unculpable –
that is, lacking in a sense of culpability -- they feel and act about the
things their money has wrought or is wringing on everyone else. Does this sound
familiar? It should, because at this moment in history, I feel like we are all in the
process of becoming unwitting human teabags being repeatedly dipped in a stenchy
brew of greed, extortion and vice to have our humanity leached out of us.The question really is, where does our culpability
begin and end? This is an era of chickens and roosts, and addressing that
thorny question in fiction feels very, very timely.
I found that
part of the book pretty satisfying – more satisfying then the Robert Johnson-Mississippi
Crossroads-Deal With The Devil part, although granted, this book takes that narrative
back to its logical roots. Hence – spoiler alert! -- at its heart, “White Tears”
is actually a book about convict leasing, mass incarceration and private
prisons, or in other words, exactly what I’ve been teaching in my class for the
last two quarters, American Crime and Punishment.
I wish I could
have assigned it last quarter, not only because it contextualizes readings I
did assign, like “Autobiography of an Imprisoned Peon” (1904), but because I
desperately need people to unpack this with (as we say in academia). Since I
can’t, I am writing about it here in the hopes I can unpack it with you. Because,
as good as I think this book is, and much as I recommend it, I also kind of
think it does a disservice to music, to collecting, to sound, to culture, to fandom,
and the actual redemption that those things can offer us. Because it is redemptive to listen to music. It is
the one sure way back to paradise, or it is for me, anyway. And paradise is
definitely not a place this book has any room for.
In fact, the
central conceit of “White Tears” is that sound waves may linger in time, “that they
persist fainter and fainter, masked by the day to day noise of the world.” If
you could invent a good enough microphone, the narrator suggests, you could
hear everything that ever happened, and honestly, I don’t think that’s so
farfetched. A few years ago, the filmmaker Sam Green made a short documentary about the (one inch) tape archive of Louis Armstrong. Green doesn’t believe in
video-taping his work or circulating it in any way other than live; so as with Robert Frank's Cocksucker Blues (only for different
reason), his films can only be seen in his presence. According to the documentary, Armstrong really
liked taping things at his home on a big, state of the art tape player, and the
film Green made ends with several minutes of the sound of Armstrong’s breath, after
he has fallen asleep in front of the microphone.
The result is,
as Green in his live narration pointed out, that for a few moments, we, the
audience, get to breath together, across time, along with Louis Armstrong. Yep. That
happened, and it happened to me, thus, in my humble opinion, giving the age of
mechanical reproduction kind of a big fat second chance. Distance may create longing, but distance can also be bridged. I like to think that those bridges are what our humanity rests on, and not as "White Tears" sort of suggests, what is taking it away.
Agreed!!!!!!!!
ReplyDeleteThere was a dentist in Charlotte, NC in the late 1940s who was very interested in "wire recording," as it was called back then. Since he also provided dental services for African Americans, not a universal activity amongst white people at the time, he was far more in touch with the local community than an outsider might have been. He recorded many local (Charlotte) blues musicians in the late 1940s. Some of this material was released on (I think) a Smithsonian Folkways lp called Negro Songs Of Protest Volume One (I am too lazy to google it).
ReplyDeleteNone of the performers were particularly exceptional, just the sort of guys who probably played at local house parties and juke joints. The tunes were commonplace too, familiar blues changes and the like. Here and there, however, the lyrics were surprisingly different, since the dentist was clearly considered a member of the club. While the blues songs were about hard times and trying to make ends meet, as you would expect, they weren't all just about how "my woman let me down" or "bossman won't pay." Some had lines that said things like (I am paraphrasing), "times are so hard, I've got to get my six gun and rob and steal."
So there was some other narrative in the blues that white record collectors were excluded from. The classic blues recordings were classic, indeed, and deserve to be revered, but this record suggests that maybe the songs being sung for the record producers wasn't every song that the singers knew.
yes I read about this book and am intrigued. I do wonder if there is not, in the event, a whiff of feeling good about feeling bad (on the part of the author)? Still interesting thought experiment and yup there is still la lot to learn about the blues. I mean unpack. African Americans did not merely have a huge influence on American popular music; they are the story.
ReplyDeletei hope to read this book this summer because of this essay. Like so many people who grew up on rock and roll and punk music, i went for the blues in a BIG way during my youth but always fretted about how i" wasn't really MY music" and such, as I am white and in some ways a boring suburban punk. But I'm also a product of the South and could never ignore the implications of this. My family iwas poor and we go back only a single generation to dirt farming in arkansas. MY music is really just whatever I've managed to gather, seek out and sometimes curate for others in addition to play for audiences and my bandmates in the short time I considered myself in a band, c 1980-1983. One cannot help it if you find yourself responding to the blues because you think your world lacks authenticity. The process of raising our family out of dirt has been akin to how they took the indians off the reservations in the 1960s and installed them in the cities in an attempt to better their lives. It's been a culture shock, the second half of the 20th century. I often wonder what all we've lost compared to what we think we have gained.
ReplyDeleteHey Clark, thanks for your comment. The whole authenticity argument in rock and pop, punk and indie is very problematic, isn't it? I read a good defense of mashup recently; it argued that people - in that case, djays -- want to insert themselves into the narrative of pop by using their favorite records, it's like writing yourself into history. I think that's what being in a band does...and it's a really powerful thing. And raising one's family out of the dirt, that's not a raced thing, it's an AMERICAN thing. I'd love to hear what you think about White Tears once you've read it...stay in touch!! Gx
ReplyDelete